Multimedia

Author Topic: Post Your Photo Setup [V4]  (Read 246519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robbb

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #285 on: December 15, 2010, 03:17:19 PM »
i made bad experience with x-rays.
took a huge bag full of film with me, in my carry-on bag, mostly kodak and fuji 400 colour film and some t-max400 on a short distance flight inside europe. (i believe the security checks in europe are way weaker than in the us.)
but anyway nearly every film has that typical x-ray damage in wave form. even the unexposed rolls that i exposed a few months after the x-ray treatment still got that wavy pattern albeit not that strong as the already exposed films.
http://flickr.com/photos/robbbbbb//" target="_blank" >flickr

Offline austrian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1555
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #286 on: December 15, 2010, 03:18:08 PM »
Thats what happens to people who have to much money and can' decide.

Offline Lucas!

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
    • View Profile
    • http://www.flickr.com/Lucasnilsson
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #287 on: December 15, 2010, 03:38:40 PM »



Offline Brendan O.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3467
    • View Profile
    • http://www.brndn.nl
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #288 on: December 15, 2010, 05:59:03 PM »
Can this thread title be changed to 'evoke jealousy thread'?

Offline JFax

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #289 on: December 15, 2010, 06:48:18 PM »
Thats right Lucas. I got a bag with film checked in by mistake. The "expert" they called in to the lab when I complained about the quality of the prints had he negs under the loup and confirmed it as x-ray damage. They however still gave me like 30% off since I wasnt happy with the results.

Miiiiiiiiiiiight have been the machine though, had a few rolls from Hong Kong with similar problem which I had not checked in, just hand carry.
Quote from: andreasTHN;1991264
He is so good that he probably doesnt have a serial number on his frame, just a cheat code...

Offline lukepeeters

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
    • View Profile
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/luke_photos/
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #290 on: December 15, 2010, 06:49:36 PM »
Yeah them glasses must cost alot.

Offline Pffffff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 507
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #291 on: December 16, 2010, 01:16:02 AM »
Lucas is that black tape for brighter focusing screen(I'm not sure how it's called, maybe rangefinder coupling?)?

Offline scott

  • BMXFUtographer
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1597
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #292 on: December 16, 2010, 11:26:07 AM »
It's supposed to stop the rangefinder field from getting blown out from harsh light pointed directly at the camera. It'll actually make the frame lines appear darker though.

Some people notice it. I've never had an issue myself though.

Offline Lucas!

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
    • View Profile
    • http://www.flickr.com/Lucasnilsson
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #293 on: December 16, 2010, 12:55:24 PM »
yeah, scott is right. it's pretty much just do avoid getting it blown out.

i tested it back home and cut the piece just small enough to avoid getting the framelnes dark(35mm) but still increase the contrast in the patch and making the 135 or 90 wichever you see when yo have the 35mm frameline up go a little bit darker

Offline Jambar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1279
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #294 on: December 16, 2010, 02:08:04 PM »
Quote from: austrian;3373989
Thats what happens to people who have to much money and can' decide.


both yours? or works?
Refs : Brettbmx,moltenbykes,frazchops,under24lbs, mauricesnail, scooter.......

Offline austrian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1555
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #295 on: December 16, 2010, 08:24:24 PM »
haha. good question.
canon work
nikon life

Offline Dick

  • Send Dudes
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 8582
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #296 on: December 17, 2010, 07:24:29 AM »
Quote from: austrian;3373989
Thats what happens to people who have to much money and can' decide.


What body do you prefer?
Quote from: alex.;3333492
I don\'t think anyone is going to literally kill her. She\'ll probably just get thrown in jail and get raped a bunch.

Offline austrian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1555
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #297 on: December 17, 2010, 12:17:28 PM »
d700.
Both have their advantages, but the d700 is just better in my opinion.
The AF on the 5d simply sucks, compared to nikon's.
Also the handling of the nikon is way better, except for choosing single af-points, you can do that faster and easier on the canon.
All in all, the canon is a really nice camera, the video-option is reaaaally nice, but if you don't need that, the nikon is just the better camera.

Offline brian itzaina

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3892
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #298 on: December 17, 2010, 08:20:08 PM »
http://www.flickr.com/photos/somuchforsale/5270232990/" title="IMG_7257 by veloreality, on Flickr">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5122/5270232990_f0389b4f2f_z.jpg" width="640" height="480" alt="IMG_7257" />
http://www.flickr.com/photos/somuchforsale/5269623771/" title="IMG_7262 by veloreality, on Flickr">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5084/5269623771_9156aa91ab_z.jpg" width="640" height="480" alt="IMG_7262" />
Quote from: GMLN;3522927
Can everyone please stop saying swag.

Swag
 
tumblrington

Offline Dick

  • Send Dudes
  • Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 8582
    • View Profile
Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #299 on: December 17, 2010, 08:38:54 PM »
Quote from: austrian;3374662
d700.
Both have their advantages, but the d700 is just better in my opinion.
The AF on the 5d simply sucks, compared to nikon's.
Also the handling of the nikon is way better, except for choosing single af-points, you can do that faster and easier on the canon.
All in all, the canon is a really nice camera, the video-option is reaaaally nice, but if you don't need that, the nikon is just the better camera.


Honestly, I'm biased with Nikon. I've used plenty of Canons and they never felt "right" to me. I just thought I'd get your input seeing as you are the owner of both and have plenty of experience with them. A d700 is on my wish list as of late, no idea when I'll be getting one though.
Quote from: alex.;3333492
I don\'t think anyone is going to literally kill her. She\'ll probably just get thrown in jail and get raped a bunch.

Bikeguide.org - Bike maintenance for BMX'ers

Post Your Photo Setup [V4]
« Reply #299 on: December 17, 2010, 08:38:54 PM »

 

-->

Tell them " Sheepdog sent you", for a little something special

Click this image for a little something special