Multimedia

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - G

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 26
121
The Bike Shop / Re: cruiser or 24 advice
« on: May 22, 2015, 06:13:17 PM »
again, thanks for the input

particularly cmc4130 for da knowledge. i think tom/ sasha nailed it in the first post but it's good to know why

and yes g, i really want to ride one to see what the fuss is about (hence the interest in this haro) for myself, luckilly for you i never leave london but thanks for the offer! however in return if you are ever in the big smoke you'd be welcome to come to an alleycat or do a checkpoint

that goes for anyone on here tho, next one's next friday (29th), check my subtle tumblr in my sig for upcoming events. if anyone wants to race you can ride any bike you like: brakes, gears, whatevs. pm me if so

edit: although i still don't understand if there is a difference between a cruiser and a 24" if someone could clarify

The idea behind the model C was to take freestyle BMX geometry and put bigger wheels on. So the BB is super high because it needs to feel like a freestyle BMX when you pull up, ie. you are starting from the same position relative to the wheel axle. With a high BB the BB (and so your feet) go up and back straight away, with a lower BB than the axle the BB will go forwards and up then straight up before it starts moving back. It also puts you more "above" the wheels than "between" them.
Head angle steeper, chainstays shorter (than a racey 24").

:)
G.

122
so how long has the op not been riding while waiting to get a frame repaired that is maybe 1 degree off? i can't see any serious rider taking off that amount of time due to something they'd never even feel. I mean just look at how most riders have their back wheels in the dropouts: cocked to one side for chain tension or just bc it always tightens up that way. I mean really now....

That seems like a harsh attitude. OP hasn't posted in nearly a month so maybe it all got sorted, but having ridden a frame that was very bent in the past for an extended period I can attest that you definitely feel it and if you pay top dollar for it you WOULD be pissed.

:)
G.

hmmm i can see your point G, and i have read your analysis on frame geo extensively through each and every one of your tech articles. But wasnt it you who was saying that NO frame is perfect and is in fact allowed a certain degree of variance in each and every angle and dimension?

Yes. But...

There has to be a limit to the acceptable variation. If you can "eyeball" a frame and it looks obviously bent or twisted then it is probably out by more than the 0.25 or 0.5 of a millimeter that would be "reasonable" for a high end frame. Its amazing how many people DO ride around on bent/twisted frames, look around a skatepark and you will often see one or two, and when those riders replace them with new straight ones they will often need a little while to adjust, which can be very frustrating. But if you are paying top dollar you shouldn't have to accept it feeling like a hammered old beater.

:)
G.

123
The Bike Shop / Re: Removing blown bearing race in odyssey driver
« on: May 21, 2015, 03:26:52 PM »
If I were you I would take a close good look at the bearing shoulder that the innermost driver bearing butts up against when the conenut is done up. Normally Joytech axles have a slight radius that gets deformed from the wheel being done up tight or worse, a blown inner driver bearing. If so, sell your mate on an Ody female axle, which has a nice square edge that's kinder to/more tolerant of inner driver bearing inner races

Very happy someone noticed this.

:)
G.

124
The Bike Shop / Re: Brakes
« on: May 21, 2015, 03:25:12 PM »
I prefer the Fly brakes over the Odyssey because of the spring size. I broke the Odyssey spring quite a bit since it's pretty small. There's another thread about this too...

http://www.bikeguide.org/forum/index.php/topic,220747.0.html

Perhaps ought to mention that they pay you... you know just for the sake of transparency... I dont want to be a dick about it or anything but you haven't posted in months then post three (out of four) comments plugging Fly's products..

:)
G.

True, they do... But out of the sake of transparency, I broke every single spring I put into the Odyssey brake and that was my issue that I stated while comparing the two... I broke at least 5 of the Springfield brake springs before resorting to rubber bands to make it work. Even the "revised" ones broke pretty quickly for me. Prior to the two posts I made explaining why I choose the Fly brake, I never mentioned that I broke the springs that many times for the sake of not hurting your sales. I have yet to break one of the Fly brake springs because it's oversized, and for what it's used for, it's not going to break. The discussion is about our opinion on the two brakes. I'm giving my honest opinion. I'd run the Fly brakes regardless of the situation. I ran their brakes before I ran the Springfields, long before I ever worked for them. I never did a review of the Springhanger brake on my site. I also never changed my review of the Springfield brake that I did do, that was far more positive than my current outlook on the spring used. I can update it with info that the springs break constantly if you would prefer?

Also, while we're on the topic of being paid... Check the The Union from time to time because that's what I'm busy doing instead of posting here every day... I constantly plug Odyssey, Sunday and G-Sport products all the time and you guys DON'T pay me, along with every other brand that are producing solid products. NONE of them pay for it anymore because I was sick of the bull shit like this stating "they pay you, so you play favorites". Fly pays me to handle their social media channels and I keep that completely separate from my personal work. In fact, prior to you telling everyone I work for them, nobody probably had a clue since I don't tell anyone to avoid any sort of conflict.  I don't need people assuming I play favorites because I put a lot of effort in to try to give every brand the fair share on a FREE outlet to them. Ask Nuno... Every time he sends me something to promote for Odyssey, Sunday... It's posted right away no questions asked. I don't recall how many sites other than The Union posted the news that your new hub guards were out... I'm sure a few of the ones Odyssey / Sunday advertise with "had" to post it.

Losing respect for you quite quickly with your assumptions these days. Not to be a dick about it.

Wow. Really didn't expect to elicit that kind of reply. I genuinely wasn't trying to be a dick about it, just seemed strange. Nothing for weeks, then two brake posts and a tripod plug... And yes, we do Tripod etc.
As it happens, I was just looking on the Union at something the other day and thinking it was cool that you cover everything regardless of whether people advertise, whereas for example Dig, dont, which seems insane to me, how do they expect to compete with a site like the comeup that is a one stops shop if they dont cover everything? Sure in an ideal world "kids" would seek out good unique content, but realistically a lot don't seem to.

We have a lot of the Springfields out in the wild now and spring failure is not a huge issue these days as far as I am aware. We sell a lot of them and most of the feedback is good, and it definitely seems to have helped a lot with the issue of riders not being comfortable setting brakes up.
Personally I believe that the spring-hanger concept is inherently flawed from an engineering perspective; in that your straddle is always going to have to be bent so the first bit of pull is always likely to be wasted on straightening it somewhat; but I haven't actually tried it so maybe that bit is not too noticeable.

I'm sorry if I offended you and I do wish you all the best with the Union.

:)
G.

125
The Bike Shop / Re: Fly Manual vs. Odyssey Springfield brakes
« on: May 20, 2015, 03:40:17 PM »
The young kid broke one off a 2015 Sunday complete.  So I gave him an extra one I had from back in my Texas days and he did the exact same thing.  Do you really think those could be from the same batch, G?  Mine was for sure from probably the first few months those brakes went to aftermarket sales. 

The kid is your typical "that kid is only 15!?!?!?" type of ogar looking kid.  I just chalked it up to that.

It could be. We definitely don't hear of as many breakages as we did in the early days. But equally it could be something else, impossible to say without seeing it and knowing how it was assembled etc.

:)
G.

126
so how long has the op not been riding while waiting to get a frame repaired that is maybe 1 degree off? i can't see any serious rider taking off that amount of time due to something they'd never even feel. I mean just look at how most riders have their back wheels in the dropouts: cocked to one side for chain tension or just bc it always tightens up that way. I mean really now....

That seems like a harsh attitude. OP hasn't posted in nearly a month so maybe it all got sorted, but having ridden a frame that was very bent in the past for an extended period I can attest that you definitely feel it and if you pay top dollar for it you WOULD be pissed.

:)
G.

127
The Bike Shop / Re: cruiser or 24 advice
« on: May 20, 2015, 03:08:10 PM »
That's a cruiser. 24" cruisers have been around for a hell of a long time, I have a GT in my cellar that must be 30 years old. It rides like shit compared to my Wave C. The low BB just kills it.

If you are anywhere near Sheffield you are welcome to come and try out my 24" you really need to ride it to "get" it.

The Model C pretty much kick started the modern geometry in about 2010 (? sorry I am too lazy to look this up) so anything before that will most likely be sluggish. At one point we had kind of over ordered the Wave C frameset and they got sold off ridiculously cheap so you may well find a deal, it is stunning and I predict a future collectors item, I definitely wouldn't want to sell mine.

:)
G.

128
The Bike Shop / Re: Fly Manual vs. Odyssey Springfield brakes
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:51:53 AM »
I really don't understand how people break the spring on those breaks....  but I know it happens a lot.  Young kid at my local has done it twice in a month.  It never happened to me, though. 

Fly's look cool.

We had a batch of crappy springs unfortunately. I think it is pretty rare now.

:)
G.

129
The Bike Shop / Re: threadworthy: hubguards
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:50:56 AM »
I see the structural idea of the shape of the uniguard, but worry that it would feel odd when ice-picking since its not round, seeing how I normally grind on normal hubguards.

Dropouts aren't round either.

The guard is only holding your lateral position, it shouldn't have much weight on it so I very much doubt that there would be even a slight effect, probably less significant than a slight flat spot ground on your peg.

:)
G.

130
The Bike Shop / Re: threadworthy: hubguards
« on: May 17, 2015, 04:27:46 PM »
Have you considered our new Uniguard?

http://www.gsportbmx.com/products/hub-guards/uniguard/

Pretty cheap, slides well and fitting is very straightforward with no dropout spreading.

:)
G.

131
The Bike Shop / Re: Brakes
« on: May 17, 2015, 04:24:27 PM »
Brake arm mount position on the frame is a significant factor, brake pad washer stack is significant also. Many brakes were designed around existing brakes and/or when tyres weren't as huge as they are now.

Yes the Springfields were designed with a decent amount of tyre clearance in mind and are probably one of the most spacious (but I haven't actually made a comparison with every brake on the market).

:)
G.   

132
The Bike Shop / Re: Brakes
« on: May 15, 2015, 04:39:05 PM »
I prefer the Fly brakes over the Odyssey because of the spring size. I broke the Odyssey spring quite a bit since it's pretty small. There's another thread about this too...

http://www.bikeguide.org/forum/index.php/topic,220747.0.html

Perhaps ought to mention that they pay you... you know just for the sake of transparency... I dont want to be a dick about it or anything but you haven't posted in months then post three (out of four) comments plugging Fly's products..

:)
G.

133
The Bike Shop / Re: Surly Cross Check Build
« on: May 11, 2015, 08:49:41 AM »
1 x 10 with a short cage Zee clutch mech and shifter. SLX or XT discs with the finned icetech pads, flat pedals (sealed trailmix if you can find them), widest tyres you can fit. slx cranks with a single ring oval ideally (oval rings are fantastic).

:)
G.

134
The Lounge / Re: General election
« on: May 11, 2015, 08:44:40 AM »
If your country goes to shit (as many of you seem to think it will) and the exchange rate goes down think of how many of us antipodes will be flying over there for our working holidays in your dark, wet and genuinely depressing corner of the world. Just think, after a hard days underpaid work a British gentleman will go down to his local only to be greeted with "G'day moite, which wannnaya shit beers can oii get yah?"(Good evening sir, may I get you a beverage?) then get bullied about the latest English loss in cricket. The expression "choice as, bro" will eventually creep its way into the Queen's English. Think of the real cost Brits, think of the future. You will probably never see British hospitality staff again... Dark dreary days ahead for you guys. I suppose you'd be used to that though.

More likely you will find an influx of whinging poms turning up down under to complain its too hot...

:)
G.

135
The Bike Shop / Re: G Spor ratchet driver
« on: May 09, 2015, 06:13:49 PM »
Surely the first place you would look would be Empire?
http://www.empirebmx.com/gsport-ratchet-driver

:)
G.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 26
-->

Tell them " Sheepdog sent you", for a little something special

Click this image for a little something special
Hello