286
The Bike Shop / Re: Ultimate oilslick 2.0
« on: January 09, 2015, 02:19:35 PM »
cannot be unseen
Multimedia |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
It has to do with rotational weight. Now go fuck off.G sport nipple you torque more on the shitty ones than the g sport nips
What
If I remember correctly G mentioned previously that they only tested one pair of forks per competing brand. If this is the case again then it is a bit weird, statistically, to round up all forks for which n=1 to within 0.1 K, and for the one brand for which n≥1 (I assume more than one Odyssey fork was tested) to round up to 650 K+. It's not wrong perse it's just a bit of a weird way to represent your data in my opinion. What is the number of replicates, average number of cycles and standard deviation for Odyssey forks?
It's only BMX.
I'm not the one who made the barplot, just playing devils advocate. For what it's worth I'd never venture elsewhere when it comes to forks, owned 7 Odyssey forks and the fork that came on my complete bike in 11 years of riding. I actually think the stampy test is really cool and testing your product beyond industry standard is the way to go. I just think the barplot is a bit misleading and if I remember correctly G actually mentioned pretty much the same thing previously but called it not being able to publish data of competitors forks due to only one fork per competing brand being tested. So now that they did a second stampy test I'm curious to find out more about the data on Odyssey forks: How many were tested? What was the average number of cycles until failure? Where the results reproducible?
Tell them " Sheepdog sent you", for a little something special |
Click this image for a little something special |